groupOfNames and rfc2307bis situation must be cleaned
The rfc2307bis current option should be removed. posixGroup and groupOfNames are too different to be handled by the same class. Object groups should use groupOfNames instead of gosaGroupOfNames (or both?). The only field in gosaGroupOfNames not in groupOfNames is gosaGroupObjects which stores which objecttypes are in the group. We need to see if we can store that elsewhere or stop storing that.
(from redmine: issue id 3718, created on 2015-04-23, closed on 2015-05-26)
- Relations:
- relates #3440 (closed)
- copied_to #3738
- Changesets:
- Revision 1434a5a3 by Côme Chilliet on 2015-04-23T09:41:01.000Z:
Fixes #3718 Removed RFC2307 option- Revision 277c6bc1 by Côme Chilliet on 2015-04-23T09:41:13.000Z:
Fixes #3718 Removed RFC2307 option- Revision 09925de2 by Côme Chilliet on 2015-05-20T17:21:19.000Z:
Fixes #3718 Using groupOfNames in object groups- Revision bbee90aa by Côme Chilliet on 2015-05-20T17:21:35.000Z:
Fixes #3718 Using groupOfNames in object groups- Custom Fields:
- Bug in version: 1.0.8.5
- Uploads: