make functions names consistent

Actually we have update(), getfields(), setfields()...

As said by Côme :

"There are basically 3 levels we can work on, form fields, FD fields and LDAP fields. I did not yet quite worked out which one are the more usefull through the webservice."

"We could change getfields for formfields and have getfields as a mirror of setfields"

The documentation should tell what is the datalevel the function is working on.

(from redmine: issue id 4790, created on 2016-05-19, closed on 2016-05-30)

• Relations:
  • relates #4791 (closed)
• Changesets:
  • Revision 294e4077 by Côme Chilliet on 2016-05-23T10:34:15.000Z:

Fixes #4790 Improved webservice method names, features, documentation and ACL handling.

• Revision 2dbc5872 by Côme Chilliet on 2016-05-23T10:34:43.000Z:

Fixes #4790 Improved webservice method names, features, documentation and ACL handling.

• Custom Fields:
  • Bug in version: 1.0.12

hello,

yes i agree.

• more docs
• getfields renamed as formfields
• getfields as a mirror of setfields

Cheers

(from redmine: written on 2016-05-19)

There is now: formfields, formpost, getfields, setfields. Each is documented. I also added ACL handling in setfields as it was missing.

It should also fix #4798 (closed)

(from redmine: written on 2016-05-23)

looks good to me. Thanks !

(from redmine: written on 2016-05-26)

Close issue

(from redmine: written on 2016-05-30)

closed

added Changed label