Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • fusiondirectory fusiondirectory
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
  • Issues 39
    • Issues 39
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Package Registry
    • Container Registry
    • Terraform modules
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • fusiondirectoryfusiondirectory
  • fusiondirectoryfusiondirectory
  • Issues
  • #4866
Something went wrong while setting issue due date.
Closed
Open
Issue created 8 years ago by bmortier@bmortierMaintainer
  • New related issue

  • New related issue

Could the list displayed by fusiondirectory be sorted

Closed

Could the list displayed by fusiondirectory be sorted

Hello,

the list of object inside select like a list of member in a group are not sorted. Could we do this ?

Cheers

Edited 7 years ago

    Tasks

    0

    No tasks are currently assigned. Use tasks to break down this issue into smaller parts.

    Linked items
    0

    Link issues together to show that they're related. Learn more.

    Activity


    • bmortier changed the description 7 years ago

      changed the description

      By bmortier on 2017-10-16T14:23:56 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier added enhancement and removed ~344 Bugs labels 7 years ago

      added enhancement and removed ~344 Bugs labels

      By bmortier on 2017-10-16T14:24:13 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier changed the description 7 years ago

      changed the description

      By bmortier on 2017-10-16T14:24:21 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier added ~590 label 7 years ago

      added ~590 label

      By bmortier on 2017-12-14T15:49:52 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier
      bmortier @bmortier · 7 years ago
      Author Maintainer

      We could, in which case we’d add a sort in SetAttribute after reading LDAP values, from which all multi-valuated attributes inherits.

      I’m not sure about the performance implications, it will slow down all opening of objects with multi-valuated attributes, even when opened through the webservice or so. But I’m not sure these slowdown would be noticeable except when there are really a lot of values.

      By Côme Chilliet on 2018-01-31T16:05:00 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier created branch 4866-could-the-list-displayed-by-fusiondirectory-be-sorted 7 years ago

      created branch 4866-could-the-list-displayed-by-fusiondirectory-be-sorted

      By Côme Chilliet on 2018-01-31T16:05:10 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier mentioned in merge request !113 7 years ago

      mentioned in merge request !113

      By Côme Chilliet on 2018-01-31T16:05:11 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier mentioned in commit 06da2f18 7 years ago

      mentioned in commit 06da2f18

      By Côme Chilliet on 2018-01-31T16:25:36 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier mentioned in issue #5785 7 years ago

      mentioned in issue #5785

      By Côme Chilliet on 2018-03-05T10:40:49 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier added PJ1802-0188 label 7 years ago

      added PJ1802-0188 label

      By bmortier on 2018-03-26T08:26:16 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier changed milestone to %FusionDirectory 1.4 7 years ago

      changed milestone to %FusionDirectory 1.4

      By Côme Chilliet on 2018-04-19T07:20:03 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier
      bmortier @bmortier · 5 years ago
      Author Maintainer

      hello @MCMic,

      we could do that in a mr and build a particular version, i think supann will be the most affected by this as they use lots of multivaluated fields do you think of othe plugins that will be affected by this ?

      Cheers

      By bmortier on 2019-08-07T13:05:57 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier added 5m of time spent at 2019-08-07 5 years ago

      added 5m of time spent at 2019-08-07

      By bmortier on 2019-08-07T13:05:58 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier mentioned in commit e6fe53dc 5 years ago

      mentioned in commit e6fe53dc

      By Côme Chilliet on 2019-08-07T13:24:14 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier added To Be Tested label 5 years ago

      added To Be Tested label

    • bmortier changed due date to August 07, 2019 5 years ago

      changed due date to August 07, 2019

      By bmortier on 2019-08-07T13:36:06 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier added 30m of time spent at 2019-08-07 5 years ago

      added 30m of time spent at 2019-08-07

      By Côme Chilliet on 2019-08-07T13:53:21 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier
      bmortier @bmortier · 5 years ago
      Author Maintainer

      No Selenium tests failed after merging this

      By Côme Chilliet on 2019-08-08T07:10:44 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier assigned to @jswaelens and unassigned @MCMic 5 years ago

      assigned to @jswaelens and unassigned @MCMic

      By bmortier on 2019-08-08T07:49:10 (imported from GitLab)

    • bmortier removed due date 5 years ago

      removed due date

      By bmortier on 2019-08-08T07:49:13 (imported from GitLab)

    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    Please register or sign in to reply
    Assignee
    bmortier's avatar
    bmortier
    Assign to
    Labels
    0
    None
    0
    None
      Assign labels
    • Manage project labels

    Milestone
    No milestone
    None
    Due date
    None
    None
    None
    Time tracking
    No estimate or time spent
    Confidentiality
    Not confidential
    Not confidential

    You are going to turn on confidentiality. Only project members with at least the Reporter role, the author, and assignees can view or be notified about this issue.

    Lock issue
    Unlocked
    0
    0 Participants
    Reference: